![]() Wands were developed in Europe at an unknown point, though it is known that it was in the B.C. Wands were often buried along or burned when their owner died. The study of the history and the magical properties of wands was called wandlore. Although the wand cores might come from the same creature, or the wood might come from the same tree, no two existing wands were exactly alike. Each wand consisted of a specific type of wood that surrounded a core of magical substance. Wands were manufactured and sold by wandmakers, the most famous of these in Great Britain being Garrick Ollivander, and in Eastern Europe, Mykew Gregorovitch. This had been a point of contention between wizards and goblins for centuries. Some magical creatures such as house-elves and goblins were known to perform magic similar to that used by wizards and, in fact, were forbidden to carry wands. Although wandless magic was more common in other countries, such as some in Africa, European wizards were generally used to using the tool and found wandless magic more difficult, requiring much more concentration and skill to perform these spells. ![]() Most spells were cast with the aid of wands, but spells could be cast without the use of wands. Wands made by Ollivander have cores of phoenix feather, unicorn hair or dragon heartstring, and are of varying woods, lengths, and flexibilities." - Description of a wand Ī wand was a quasi-sentient magical instrument through which a witch or wizard channelled their magical powers to centralise the effects for more complex results. It is made from wood and has a magical substance at its core. In a nutshell, the problem appears to be that the eraser, even set to 100% Hardness and 255 Opacity (Alpha), is not completely erasing pixels where it is used, at least when it is less than ten pixels wide." A wand is the object through which a witch or wizard channels his or her magic. In hindsight I realize I should have taken a screenshot before doing so, but I found an area that still had some smudging in places with too many lines too close together to use the 13-pixel-wide eraser and took two screenshots (attached): one of the image as it appeared to me and one with Magic Wand used on the lines at somewhere between 60 and 85% tolerance. Setting my eraser size larger (13 pixels if I recall right) seems to have gotten rid of these smudges. It appeared that the eraser tool was leaving smudges of not-quite-transparent pixels wherever I used it-pixels the Magic Wand could see but I couldn't. I had used the eraser set to (I think) 5 pixels, while all the lines had been drawn with the Line/Curve tool set to 2 pixels. I double checked that my eraser's Hardness and Opacity were set to maximum, they had been all along. All over the image were invisible brushstrokes, outlined in the 'marching ants' selection, that I recognized as being where I had erased lines that I hadn't been able to move. ![]() It also selected what appeared to be every stroke of the Eraser tool that I had used when making the lineart. The Magic Wand selected all the lines I'd drawn, as I expected. And then I noticed something very strange. "I'll just set the Tolerance higher so Magic Wand will grab the whole line, not just the middle of it." Which I did. (I don't have a functional tablet and stylus at the moment, so the Pencil tool is mostly useless to me at this time.) "Not a problem," I thought. I am using the Line/Curve tool set to Spline for most of the lineart, and my Paintbrush is set at maximum Hardness, but there appears to be no way to get a perfectly black and white image with the Line/Curve tool. The default Tolerance (50%) does not work it selects only the darkest pixels in the lines and leaves behind a grayish shadow on either side of the line's former location. When I make lineart, I often use the Magic Wand tool to select the lines themselves if I want to move part of the lineart without erasing and redrawing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |